Discussion (1L): Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

Past Offerings

Discussion (1L): Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (240O): Reasonable people sometimes disagree. How can reflective individuals hope to evaluate those disagreements? Fundamental notions of justice and rationality seem to dominate particular traditions in different places and different times. How can a twenty-first century product of American or other cultures decide which of various compelling ideas of justice and rationality is most persuasive to us? How can anyone escape the accidents of birth and tribal worldview? We will approach these questions through Alastair MacIntyre's provocative book of that name: Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Univ. Of Notre Dame Press 1988). Whether or not MacIntyre¿s neo-Aristotelian approach to the fundamental questions of ethical theory ultimately prove persuasive, his attempt to find alternatives to the utilitarian and Kantian relics of the Enlightenment will, I hope, open a conversation about what we believe and why. This discussion seminar will meet four times during the Fall quarter. You will be notified of the meeting times by the instructor. Specific dates, time, and location will also be listed in "Notes" below. Elements used in grading: Attendance and class participation.


Discussion (1L): Whose Justice? Which Rationality? | LAW 240O Section 01 Class #32238

  • 1 Units
  • Grading: Law Mandatory P/R/F
  • 2019-2020 Autumn
    Schedule No Longer Available
  • Enrollment Limitations: Consent
    • 1L: Mandatory (First-Year Required Course)
  • Learning Outcomes Addressed:
    • LO1 - Substantive and Procedural Law
    • LO2 - Legal Analysis and Reasoning
    • LO7 - Professional Skills

Notes: This class will meet 7-9pm on 9/25, 10/16, 10/28, & 11/12. Classes will be held at the instructor's home. The specific location will be sent to students prior to the first class meeting.

  • 2019-2020 Autumn
    Schedule No Longer Available
Back to the Top