Informational Risk, Institutional Review, and Autonomy in the Proposed Changes to the Common Rule

Details

Author(s):
  • Hank Greely
Publish Date:
May 31, 2012
Publication Title:
34 IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 .
Format:
Journal Article
Citation(s):
  • Megan Allyse, Katrina Karkazis, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho & David Magnus, Informational Risk, Institutional Review, and Autonomy in the Proposed Changes to the Common Rule, 34 IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (2012).

Related Organization(s):

Abstract

In 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services proposed changes to the regulations that govern human subjects protection in federally funded research. The proposed changes involve modifying inclusion standards for minimal-risk research and removing the necessity of review from certain categories of noninvasive research. All studies would instead be required to comply with privacy protections as initiated by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). We argue that relying on HIPAA to protect participants from participation-related risks in noninvasive research is insufficient to protect the autonomy and psychological health of potential research participants. Instead, we suggest a streamlined review format for these categories of research.