- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
Archives
Note: Monitoring “Inspiration”: First Amendment Limitations on Surveilling Individuals Who View Terrorist Propaganda
- Katherine Kaiser Moy
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 2
- Pages 267-290
A Bipartisan Vehicle for Change: Proposing a Novel Investigative Framework Designed to Improve and Empower Congressional Investigations
- McKay Smith
- Alan Wehbé
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 2
- Pages 237-266
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 2
- Pages 205-236
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 2
- Pages i-iv
How Congress Can Make the Earmark Process Work
- Mark Strand
- Timothy Lang
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 5
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 4
Note: A Federalist Account of the Law of Trade Secrecy
- Martin J. Salvucci
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 1
The Judicial and Generational Dispute Over Transgender Rights
- Mark J. Stern
- Karen Oehme
- Nat Stern
- Ember Urbach
- Elena Simonsen
- Alysia Garcia
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 1
- Stanford Law & Policy Review
-
- Volume 29
- Issue 1