Skip to main content

Discussion (1L): Reexamining Judicial Supremacy

Current Offerings

Discussion (1L): Reexamining Judicial Supremacy (243B): Today, it is axiomatic that the Supreme Court has the final say on the meaning of the Constitution. But when and why did that view take hold? And is maintaining it a good thing for our civic and legal cultures? In this reading group, we will read Niko Bowie and Daphna Renan's provocative new book, Supremacy, and reconsider the history and present-day significance of the Supreme Court's role in interpreting the Constitution. Elements used in grading: Full attendance, reading of assigned materials, and active participation. Class meets: 6:00 PM-8:00 PM on Sept. 14, Sept. 28, Oct. 12, Oct. 26.

Sections

Discussion (1L): Reexamining Judicial Supremacy | LAW 243B Section 01 Class #28366

  • 1 Units
  • Grading: Law Mandatory P/R/F
  • Enrollment Limitations: Consent 12
    • 1L: Mandatory (First-Year Required Course)
  • Learning Outcomes Addressed:
    • LO1 - Substantive and Procedural Law
    • LO2 - Legal Analysis and Reasoning
    • LO3 - Ability to Conduct Legal Research

Back to the Top