Sorry, Donald Trump, The Trump University Judge Was Just Following The Law

Details

Publish Date:
June 7, 2016
Author(s):
Source:
The Washington Post
Related Person(s):

Summary

“He [Judge Gonzalo Curiel] is giving us very unfair rulings, rulings that people can’t even believe. This case should have ended years ago on summary judgment. The best lawyers — I have spoken to so many lawyers — they said, this is not a case. This is a case that should have ended.”

— Donald Trump, interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” June 5, 2016

“I have had terrible rulings forever. I had a judge previous to him [Curiel], and it would have been a very quick case. This is a case I should have won on summary judgment.”

— Trump, interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” June 5, 2016

“These findings offer solid evidence that summary judgment is a weak filter designed to resolve only the most lopsided of cases where no reasonable jury could find for the other side,” said David Freeman Engstrom, Stanford University law professor and expert in civil procedure. “Unless the case is a slam dunk for one side or the other, summary judgment is not appropriate.”

Read More