Chernetsky v. State of Nevada: Appellant’s Reply Brief (Ninth Circuit)

Abstract

In 2004, the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) adopted a policy that banned a crucial practice of inmate Anthony Chernetsky’s faith, and one he had engaged in for years without incident: anointment with natural oils. Although NDOC has since amended its religious-oils policy after being rebuked by this Court in Johnson v. Baker, it continues
to forbid natural oils. And NDOC has failed to show that this ban on natural oils—of any kind or amount, and regardless of how they are obtained, used, or stored—can satisfy strict scrutiny under RLUIPA.

Details

Author(s):
  • James A. Sonne
  • Zeba Huq
  • Caleb Blackerby
  • Collin Fredricks
  • Jack Gleiberman
  • Samuel Weiss
  • Oren Nimni
Publish Date:
February 23, 2024
Format:
Brief
Citation(s):
  • James A. Sonne & Zeba Huq et al., Appellant's Reply Brief, No. 21-16540 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Feb. 23, 2024).
Related Organization(s):

Other Publications By